Our professor assigned us the task of watching a media presentation in
which a message was delivered through three separate and distinct
modalities. After watching each presented
modality, my interpretation of the message changed. This illustrates the importance of effective
communication with members of a project team.
Not only is it important to communicate confidently and consistently, it
is important to relay the message in multiple formats and in many ways. The way we communicate can change the interpretation
of the message.
In his reflections on effective leadership, Greer
points out that Ralph Waldo Emerson said “God will not have his work be made
manifest by cowards” (2010, p.61) and “A man should learn to detect and watch
that gleam of light which flashes across his mind from within, more than the
luster of the firmament of bards and sages... Trust thyself: every heart
vibrates to that iron string” (2010, p.50). In so many ways, people who trust themselves
communicate effectively because there is power and strength behind their
words. They do not back down when there
is a communication breach. Rather, they
see it as just that, a breakdown in communication. Strong communicators bring peace rather than
strife to a project because they do not blame others; they simply communicate
the message over and over in many different ways until the message is heard
(Simonson, et.al., 2012). They inspire
others to get the work done. Strong
communicators lead effectively (Portny, et.al., 2008).
|
Reflection: My
interpretation of the message as delivered in each of the different
modalities
|
|
|
Email
|
Jane needs an immediate response from Mark
regarding the status of important data.
|
|
Voicemail
|
Jane appreciates Mark’s help, but she is stuck on her project until she
receives Mark’s data. Jane needs to
know the status of the data. It seems
like an urgent request. Jane seems
annoyed with Mark.
|
|
Face to Face
|
Jane needs an immediate response regarding the
data Mark is working on since she is at a standstill and may miss her
deadline.
She communicates the urgency effectively by
approaching him face to face.
Obviously, she cannot work on her project or she would be working
rather than standing at his desk speaking to him.
|
References
Greer, M. (2010). The project management minimalist: Just enough PM to
rock your projects! (Laureate custom ed.). Baltimore: Laureate
Education, Inc.
Portny, S. E., Mantel,
S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E.
(2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects.
Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Great use of a chart here. I am a proponent of the face to face method. Although I am not impressed by the delivery, you are correct that she has unlimited time to speak to him because she cannot continue with her project.
ReplyDeleteHi Jewel,
ReplyDeleteI like how you did the comparison chart there. Very nice. We do agree with the effectiveness of the face to face communication as providing the best way to deliver the message to Mark to show the need for him to complete his task.
Take care,
Kathy
Great use of the chart! Which method would you have chosen to get the report from Mark?
ReplyDelete- Pam M.
Knowing me, I would have sent an email. If he didn't respond, I would have done the walk by "shooting." :)
ReplyDeleteI really liked the chart! It was very effective and easy to read. Not only was it visually appealing, the chart was concise and appropriate. A project manager was a good leader, an effective communicator, organized, and thorough will be able to balance any issues that may arise throughout the course of the project. The balance between project manager and the rest of the individuals or groups involved can be what makes or breaks the project. The project manager will be the go-between for all groups involved. Flexibility and communication will be very important to an effective project manager.
ReplyDeleteGreat job!
jason