“Collide” is exactly the word I was
looking for! It describes my learning
network perfectly.
As a child, I learned
information and skills by reading, listening, and imitating others. As an adult, especially as I learn and
practice new teaching methods, I acquire information and skills through
personal exploration of journals and online databases and through interactions
with my colleagues or peers. I am
challenged best academically and professionally best by technology through
online discussion boards and professional databases. Although I learn well using technology, when
I have a question, the first place I look for the answer is to a colleague or
peer. Then, I’ll confirm their knowledge
or search the answer using a reliable online source, sometimes including online
blogs and discussion boards. If I still
cannot find the answer I will access published materials, such as books. All these sources tend to “collide” with one
another to produce the final answer.
My learning network matches up
well to Connectivism, which relies heavily upon “chaos theory, importance of
networks, and the interplay of complexity and self-organization” (Davis,
2008). Often I find myself recognizing
and adjusting to pattern shifts, using other people in my network as sources
for information, interacting in a way that produces organized ideas, “nurturing
and maintaining connections,” seeking current information, enjoying diversity
of opinions, and creating connections among a variety of fields, ideas and
concepts (Davis, 2008).
References
Davis,
C., Edmunds, E., & Kelly-Bateman, V. (2008). Connectivism. In M. Orey
(Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology.
Retrieved from http://projects.coe.uga.edu/epltt/index.php?title=Connectivism
Connectivism:
http://www.connectivism.ca/
No comments:
Post a Comment